Outlier

Homes with pools use 49% more electricity per year, but it’s not just because of the pool

This summer’s record-high temperatures have sent us all running for the pool.

As the nation’s 5.4 million in-ground residential swimming pools do their part in keeping us cool, we began to get curious about how much energy they use.

It’s been estimated that 9-14 billion kilowatt hours of electricity are consumed each year just to maintain these 5.4 million swimming pools. That’s more electricity than is used each year in 11 individual US states and Washington DC. It’s as if all the retail electricity consumption in New Hampshire could grind to a halt, and then be routed to power the nation’s swimming pools.

So we wondered: how much more energy does a home with a pool use each year, relative to a home without a pool?

To investigate, we examined energy consumption data from 2 million homes (all with gas space-heating) in a climate-moderate part of the Western US, representing a mix of pool homes and non-pool homes. We were able to identify homes with pools by cross-referencing anonymous, publicly available property records. Then we looked to see if any patterns emerged related to pool ownership and energy use.

A pattern emerged: pool homes annually consume 49% more electricity and 19% more natural gas than their non-pool neighbors. The result for a pool owner is approximately $500 per year in higher energy bills – and nearly double that in states with higher electric and gas prices.

Homes with pools use 49% more electricity per year

But the question remained: is this ~$500 difference in energy consumption strictly due to the energy requirements of maintaining pool? Or are there additional factors at play? Let’s dive into the analysis…

Exploring reasons why pool homes use 49% more electricity per year than non-pool homes

Let’s consider three key factors that contribute to pool owners’ high energy bills: 1) the pool itself, 2) large home size, and, 3) lifestyle.

1. Pumping and filtering 20,000 gallons of water is extremely energy-intensive

The strongest driver of pool homes’ high energy use is…the pool! Let’s take a look.

It takes a lot of electricity to continually pump and filter the ~20,000 gallons of water that typically fills a US in-ground residential pool. It’s an astonishing amount of water: the average human being drinks only about 15,000 gallons of H2O in their lifetime. A pool pump uses more electricity than any other appliance in the house except the air-conditioner.

The average pool pump circulates 20,000 gallons of water...

Motivated by regulatory requirements, new pool pumps are becoming increasingly energy-efficient, but existing pumps’ electricity consumption has been estimated at a whopping 2,000-2,500 kilowatt-hours per year. At the national average electricity price of 11.8 cents/kWh, a pool pump can add upwards of $250-$300 to a family’s annual electricity costs.

Heating the pool can also be a major driver of pool-related energy use, especially when the pool is left uncovered. Pool heating is almost always done by natural-gas heaters (or in some regions by solar water heaters), rather than by an electric heater, and can be costly: even occasional heating can add $100-$250 to one’s yearly gas bill. However, very few pools—by one credible estimate, only about 10% of them nationwide—are heated. Likewise, our data reveals minimal difference in swimming-season natural gas usage between pool homes and non-pool homes. This suggests that residential pool heating is indeed rare, and therefore has minimal significance for our analysis.

So if pool pumping represents a little over half of the energy consumption difference between pool homes and non-pool homes, then what other factors may account for the rest of difference?

2. Homes with pools are bigger

As you might predict, homes with pools tend to be larger than homes without pools. Bigger homes mean higher energy usage. The average pool home in our dataset was 2,052 square feet. That’s 21% larger than the average non-pool home (1,693 square feet).

We saw above that the average pool home uses 49% more electricity and 19% more natural gas per year than the average home without a pool. But would we still see this big of a difference if we only compare homes of similar size?

Confining our analysis to 40,000 homes of similar size (2,500-2,600 square feet), we found that the energy consumption gap between pool homes and non-pool homes becomes only somewhat smaller: pool homes of ~2500 square feet still consume 42% more electricity and 14% more natural gas than equivalent-size homes that don’t have a pool.

The bottom line: homes with pools are larger, and the larger home size itself does appear to account for greater energy consumption. But only by a little bit.

3. Across the (diving) board, pool owners are likely to carry on a high energy consumption lifestyle

Our data suggests that pool owners systematically use more energy for reasons beyond their energy-intensive pool pump or their large home size.

We found that pool homes use significantly more electricity and natural gas than similarly sized non-pool homes in all 4 seasons, rather than just during the peak-swimming summer months. Even considering that some pool owners are likely to run their pool pump periodically in non-swim months to keep the water clean and pretty, the fact that pool homes use significantly more energy in every season (see the electricity usage pattern for similar-sized homes below) points to behavioral differences that may go beyond maintaining a pool.

Similarly-sized homes with pools use 30-50% more electricity in every season

A couple of lifestyle-related explanations for pool homes’ higher energy usage throughout the year may include:

Pool homes have more occupants. Our demographic data from the Western US shows that homes with pools have on average 9% more children (1.18 compared to 1.08 children) than non-pool homes. It seems reasonable that a family with kids would be interested in a yard with a backyard pool. At the same time: more kids = more humans using energy around the house.

Pool homes have a higher income. Data from the Association of Pool and Spa Professionals indicates that the median income for households with in-ground pools is $104,000 per year (double the national median income).  Higher income implies a greater likelihood to own additional TVs, a second refrigerator, and other discretionary appliances.

In other words, a swimming pool may be a canary in a coal mine of high household energy consumption.

Some friendly cost-saving advice to neighbors with pools

We’ve seen that the pool itself is the largest driver of pool homes’ high energy usage. Fortunately, there are some simple steps that a homeowner can take to save hundreds of dollars each year on pool-related energy costs…

Use a pool cover. First, a cover keeps the pool water clean, which means that the energy-intensive filter pump doesn’t need to run as much. In addition, a cover can reduce evaporation from the pool by more than 90%, which saves a lot of water (and keeps the water warmer). Without a cover, the entire 20,000 gallons in the pool can evaporate each year, and refills aren’t free. Replacing all that water can easily add more than $100 to a pool owner’s annual water bill in water-scarce regions.

Install a variable-speed pump. A “variable-speed” pool pump is critical to maximizing pool energy efficiency. In contrast to a standard “single-speed” pump, a variable-speed model alternates between slow and fast modes to optimize energy use throughout the day, reducing pump electricity consumption by up to 75%. Many utility companies offer a significant rebate upon purchase of an efficient pool pump.

Reduce pool pump run-time. Many pool owners simply run their pool pump longer than is necessary to keep their pool clean. It’s best to determine the minimum required run-time and stick with that. In one study, pool owners in Florida who reduced their pumping time to less than 3 hours per day were still happy with their pool’s water quality.

In the meantime, don’t forget to work on the efficiency of your swim stroke.

Special thanks to Chris Tan, Efrat Levush, Jillian Cairns, and Arhan Gunel.


Methodology Notes: Data is based on a sample of 2.04 million homes– a mix of pool homes (318,000) and non-pool homes (1.72 million)–in the Western US. For comparability of energy usage across the homes considered, this analysis is strictly confined to homes with gas heat. Energy cost estimates are based on national average 2011 energy prices: $0.118/kWh and $1.08/therm.  Estimate for lifetime water-drinking is based on a pool with approximate dimensions of 18 ft x 30 ft x 6 ft,  a rule-of-thumb turnover time of once per day, eight 8-ounce glasses of water per day, and an 80-year life expectancy. Due to the relatively moderate climate in the Western US and exclusive consideration of gas-heat homes, the reported results for annual per-household electricity consumption are lower than the US national average of 11,500 kWh/year.

Data Privacy: All data analyzed here are completely anonymous and treated in strict adherence to Opower’s Data Principles.

Author’s noteThe analysis and commentary presented above solely reflect the views of the author(s) and do not reflect the views of Opower’s utility partners.

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1050529473 Janet Byron

    Barry, this is fascinating. It would be interesting to look at the energy use of hot-tubs, too, or are hot-tubs included as pools?

    • Opower Outlier

      Hey Janet- Thanks for the question! Unfortunately there is a lack of reliable data on which homes have hot tubs, so it’s less feasible to do a specific energy-consumption analysis about that. But there are few resources out there that discuss the energy-consumption profile of hot tubs, including http://www.energyideas.org/documents/factsheets/spatips.pdf.

  • Anonymous

    Good stuff, Oliver. Thanks for the comments! Our international readers thank you for your conversions to litres and cubic metres!

  • homepools

    Agree with you . Hot tubs can save energy as well as you can use Pools .
    http://www.homepools.com

  • http://springmeter.com/ springmeter

    Performing water calculations will be one of the best practices to minimize your costs.

  • guest

    Nice work on this article/analysis!

  • http://www.melfast.com/industries/47/Pump-Manufacturers Henry Scott

    A simple solution is to use solar energy for powering the pumps, it will help to save electricity and money.

  • Starise

    As the owner of a 22,000 gallon pool in the Northeast US. I have made a few changes to the system in order to make it as energy efficient as possible.

    In answer to the post regarding solar pumps….good luck with that. The type of pump and the capacity needed to achieve a successful result with solar are not even close to one another in terms of any practical solution. Experience in keeping a pool enables the user to refine the process or conservation to an acceptable level. OTOH if the owner lets the pool go it will end up costing more.

    I don’t hire people to upkeep my pool, one less expense. I have my pump on a computer timer and I use a cover. Once the water is balanced the pump doesn’t need to be run as often, especially using a pool cover. A much larger and overlooked expense is in heating the pool. The cost of pump operation is small compared to it.

    I purchased a 250,000 gas heater used a several years back and made use of it for awhile. It wasn’t really practical for me because I don’t have access to natural gas and the only other option was propane which is fairly expensive here. In addition I decided there was no way I was renting a propane tank since I had a few 100 lb cylinders already and the local companies here won’t deliver to you unless you rent their tanks….a racket….I ended up loading the tanks up and taking them to someone to refill. Then the powers that be imposed a law that says the tanks must be mounted vertical and supported in a trailer.This and a few other new regulations actually closed at least one local dealer down. He decided the changes weren’t worth his effort. Once filled the tanks would be empty after one weekend event. So it might cost me $200.00 to have a heated pool for a few days. Don’t misunderstand….I think gas is a good way to go if you have access to it and for short stints with longer periods of cold water in between.

    Last weekend I bought a pool heat pump. Being the handy type I recently installed it myself, everything up to electrical code and piped. I got a good deal on it since it was a showroom model. Heat pumps need a certain water flow in order to function properly. This rules out a variable speed pump motor. The nice thing about a heat pump is that it is ready to go whenever I turn it on. No need to worry about a propane delivery of if I’ll have enough. It takes between 24/48 hours to get a pool this size up to temp with a heat pump but they cost less to operate than a gas fired heater. Once the pool is up to temp during the swimming season, cover it and lower the temp to 74 when not in use. If you want the pool nice by the weekend simply set the thermostat to 84 on Thursday. The warmer it gets the less money you spend because the sun takes over and the heat pump then becomes an assist to the sun and pool cover.This means the heat pump only runs occasionally. In the warmer months we were able to get the pool in the 80′s with no other source of heat. When it gets cooler the heat pump extends the swimming season and compensates for those cooler days here and there.

    Some people golf, some people have a boat or spend money on a summer home or all of the above. I am willing to spend the 100/200 extra dollars a month during the summer months to have a nice place for the kids and grand kids to come and enjoy a nice warm swim. I don’t consider it a huge extravagance compared to so many others. If my electricity fails( and my well pump) I have 22,000 gallons of chlorinated water at my disposal.

    A person can invest in a pool, be prudent in its use and not kill the power grid.

About Outlier

Outlier explores trends in how people are using energy at home. Pulling from an unprecedented (and still growing) amount of energy data—currently drawn from 50 million homes—Opower crunches energy-use information from more than 75 utility partners every day, and cross-references that with weather, household, and demographic information to produce compelling analyses in the Outlier series.